The Bat Creek stone from eastern Tennessee is a notable exception and is considered by cult archaeologists to be the best piece of evidence for pre-Columbian contacts by Old World cultures. upon to mark a path from old highway 72 to the Scott Wolter/cc by-sa 3.0 When John W. Emmert and Cyrus Thomas excavated Bat Creek Mound in 1889, they stumbled across a stone with eight unfamiliar characters. Stone, Lyle M. There has been a systematic denigrating on the part of the 'intellectuals' in the Smithsonian Museum of evidence of pre-Columbian migration from the Old World to the western hemisphere. ABSTRACT The Brass Bracelets Journal of Mormon History, Vol. MinnesotaHistorical Society, St. Paul. [8], However, "Despite the preponderance of archaeological evidence that these mound complexes were the work of sophisticated Native American civilizations," this fact has been "obscured by the Myth of the Mound Builders". [7] The forced removal of Native peoples from their land and the severing of Native people from their heritage was partially enacted by "destroying indigenous pyramid mounds" and "The creation of the Myth of the Mounds". Shepherd's Chapel with Pastor Arnold Murray. missing on Bat Creek. Gab builds Freedom Of Speech Software. That Emmert read this journal, much less had a research note published in it, indicates that he was a rather learned individual. scholar Cyrus Gordon (1971a, 1971b, 1972) confirmed that it is Semitic, Knoxville. Except for the identification of the characters as Cherokee, Thomas (1894: 391-3) is based almost verbatim on Emmert's field report. inverted from Thomas's orientation to that of the above 245-249. A lengthy discussion of the object, including a radiocarbon determination, in a local professional journal (McCulloch 1988) has recently enhanced the status of the stone as representing the best evidence of pre-Columbian contacts. Bat Creek stone, which was professionally Learn how and when to remove this template message, pre-Columbian transoceanic contact theories, Pre-Columbian transatlantic contact theories, "The Bat Creek Stone Revisited: A Fraud Exposed", "Report of the Archaeopetrography Investigation", "The Bat Creek Inscription: Did Judean Refugees Escape to Tennessee? illustration. LYHW- on both the Yehucal bulla and the Masonic illustration maintain that This possibility is certainly suggested by the following: "Another fact that should be borne in mind by the student is the danger of basing conclusions on abnormal objects, or on one or two unusual types. Photo copyright Warren W. Dexter, 1986. down to the skeletons." This small, inscribed rock was reportedly excavated from a mound in 1889 by John W. Emmert, a Smithsonian Institution field assistant, during the course of the Bureau of American Ethnology Mound Survey. East Lansing. The sample returned a calibrated radiocarbon age of A.D. 32 (427) 769 (McCulloch 1988; the age range was reported at two sigma), which is claimed to "rule out the possibility of modern origin" for the inscription (McCulloch 1988:116). Accessed 12/28/05. inscriptions are also clearly different, the Bat Creek Whiteford (1952:207-225) summarizes some of these: "It is impossible to use the data presented by Thomas in the Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology with any conviction that they present a complete or even, in some cases, an accurate picture of the material which Emmert excavated in the Tennessee Area" (1952:217) "Mound No. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1979 Indian Social Dynamics in the Period of European Contact. I am having the bone and the wood found in the tomb dated by the Smithsonian Institution by the carbon-14 process; fortunately, these items were present with the stone, for stone cannot be dated this way; the material has to be organic for carbon-14. The Bat Creek stone figured prominently in Gordon's (1971, 1974) major cult archaeology books, and subsequently received attention in a number of other fringe publications (e.g., Fell 1980; Mahan 1983; von Wuthenau . scroll. 1903 The Indians of North America in Historic Times (published as Volume 2 of The History of North America). The Radiocarbon Date http://druidry.org/obod/lore/coelbren/coelbren.html. Serenwen (undated). A pamphlet containing these articles is available fact there is already a D on Bat Creek, at the end of the second word, 5th Annual Report - authors) and I certainly agree with you that the Cherokees were Mound Builders, in fact there is not a doubt in my mind about it.". The Bat Creek Stone was recovered during a professional archaeological dig by John W. Emmert of the Smithsonian Institution's Bureau of Ethnology in 1889, during its Mound Survey Project. [3] The "Cherokee writing system was invented in 1819," and If the tablet were inscribed with Cherokee, this would suggest Mound 3 is much younger than "the solid archaeological data" that identifies it as much older. Bat Creek instead correctly Click on link for PDF file. excavated and whose context been carbon-dated to In subsequent publications, Gordon (1971:186, 1972:10-12) referred to this sign as "problematic," and more recently (Gordon 1974) did not mention sign vi in his discussion of the Bat Creek stone. Archaeology and Creationism, edited by Francis B. Harrold and Baymond A. Eve, University of Iowa Press, pp. "belonging to Yehucal" (Mazar 2006: 26). The "Did Judean Refugees Escape to Tennessee? The late Semitic languages As we discuss below, the Bat Creek stone received scant attention from . The largest of these, Mound 1, was located on the east side of the creek. typical of brasses formed by the cementation process, which was discovered during the last centuries B.C. Dalton claims that the Sacred Stone is a revealed translation of the Rosetta Stone, even though the actual Egyptian translation of the stone into English is well known. It is wise therefore to refrain from basing theories on one or two specimens of an unusual or abnormal type, unless their claim to a place among genuine prehistoric relics can be established beyond dispute. 1907 Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico.Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. Catalogue No. Mahan, Joseph B. Jr. 32 A.D. and 769 A.D.(McCulloch 1988). there are no signs of the two vertical strokes that now are present in the upper left corner. that the first letter is a (reversed) resh. "Report of Archaeopetrography Investigation on the Bat Creek Stone of 1889," July 14, 2010, http://www.ampetrographic.com/files/BatCreekStone.pdf. Bat Creek Stone - (The Translation) - The Shepherd's Chapel Eagle Wings Ministries 4.85K subscribers Subscribe 603 views 1 month ago @TheShepherdsChapel Show more Show more Enjoy 1 week. have published a book [16] It has subsequently been loaned to the Museum of the Cherokee Indian in Cherokee, N.C., where it has been on display since 2015. Hamilton, Henry Over the years (especially during the nineteenth century) numerous examples of such inscriptions have surfaced, virtually all of which are now recognized as fraudulent (cf. Gordon (1971, 1972) later identified sign viii as "aleph," but did not mention it in a subsequent discussion of the Bat Creek stone (Gordon 1974). [15] And Professor in Biblical Studies and Ancient Near Eastern Studies at Johns Hopkins University, Kyle McCarter expresses, "the Bat Creek stone has no place in the inventory of Hebrew inscriptions from the time of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome" and "belongs to the melodrama of American archaeology in the late 19th century". Dexter's excellent photographs of the inscription A cluster of black oak and sassafras trees, along with some Robert Mainfort and Mary Kwas concluded the inscription is not genuine paleo-Hebrew but rather a 19th-century forgery, and other respected archaeologists such as Kenneth Feder have supported the claim that the tablet is a fraud. Stones bearing inscriptions in Hebrew or other Old World characters have at last been banished from the list of prehistoric relics. Quotes and ideas attributed to Arnold Murray are the intellectual property of Arnold Murray, of course.Earth Vs. the Flying Saucers (1956) was produced by Clover Productions. [1] The two bracelets found in the Mound were initially identified by both Emmert and Thomas as "copper", but a 1970 Smithsonian analysis concluded the bracelets were in fact heavily leaded yellow brass. The Bat Creek inscription is an inscribed stone tablet found by John W. Emmert on February 14, 1889. 1991 Fantastic Archaeology: The Wild Side of North American Prehistory. 87-93. The specimens from Bat Creek (Figure 2), however, exhibit a seam and a hollow core indicating that they were wrought, rather than cut from brass wire. In: Book of the Descendants of Doctor Benjamin Lee and Dorothy Gordon, edited by M.B. [9] Historian Sarah E. Baires writes that the attribution of the mound builders to "any groupother than Native Americans" reflects the "practices" of European settlers that primarily "included the erasure of Native American ties to their cultural landscapes". There is no way this subtle main line would then read RQ , LYHWD[M], i.e. Today, this mound is submerged by a reservoir. [3] He asserted that the inscription "could be translated as some variation of 'For the Jews'". 169-413. The stone was found placed behind the head of one of the bodies in the mounds. SATANIC MEDIA EXPOSED, Uvalde TX Shooting LIES! In the 1894 Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, the inscription was first officially mentioned along with other artifacts recovered from the Bat Creek Mound excavations. fact that during the Civil War, Emmert served in the Confederate Quartermaster Department, presumably as a result of his previous experience as a "store keeper" (John W. Emmert, Compiled Service Record, M268/346, National Archives). www.madoc1170.com/home.htm. or "dh ' 7NESb" in Thomas's orientation. This conclusion is based on assessments by two Near Eastern language specialists, one of whom (Cyrus Gordon) considers some (but not all) of the signs to be Paleo-Hebrew. In the published literature, there is no indication that any Cherokee scholar has ever agreed with Cyrus Thomas's interpretation of the Bat Creek stone, nor have we encountered any references to the stone in the Cherokee linguistic or ethnographic literature (e.g., Mooney 1892, as well as examples noted below). The earthwork was reportedly constructed over a limestone slab "vault" containing 16 individuals; a necklace of "many small J. Huston MuCulloch, an Ohio State University economics professor . most annoying commercials on tv right now 2020, velocette factory records,